VOICES Voices Icon Ideas and Insight From Explorers


Cry of the Innocent

“Anyone who has accustomed himself to regard the life of any living creature as worthless is in danger of arriving also at the idea of worthless human lives.”
—Albert Schweitzer


What effects does the international fur trade have on the consciousness of society? How does it affect what it means to be human? Cry of the Innocent: The Voices that Can’t speak, a revealing new film, explores the psychological and spiritual factors that contribute to animal cruelty in the fur industry. Rather than merely covering tales of brutality, Cry of the Innocent, interprets from the “soul perspective” in an attempt to explore the underlying source of animal abuse and the subsequent disconnection in society.

Filmmaker Kathleen Lowson stresses the importance of the larger picture. The mistreatment of animals for their fur is a systemic issue that involves recognition from social, cultural, psychological and spiritual perspectives. In a recent interview, Lowson states, “the slaughter of millions of animals for their fur reflects a paradigm of a more expansive nemesis permeating our world. We are not separate from the animals, not separate from the earth… it’s all interconnected. Abuse and cruelty toward animals and the innocent is[sic] an energy of violence that carries over into our own lives. When we disconnect from the suffering of sentient beings, we disconnect from our own suffering.”

The North American fur trade began in the 1600s, soon after the first contact between Europeans and Native Americans. Trade routes took advantage of areas naturally rich in fur-bearing species, such as the Rocky Mountains, Canadian regions and the northern states of the United States, and eventually extended overseas to Europe and Russia. With the popularization of fur on certain fashionable items, fur trade went up exponentially as the French and the English competed from fur trading posts in the Hudson Bay. As the demand for beaver pelts increased, animal resources dwindled, and fur farming became an easy way to keep up with European desires.

Fur quickly became a cultural symbol of luxury and status and, for women especially, of sexuality and femininity. Nearly every small, furry animal became fashionable: badger, skunk, wolf, polecat, squirrel, musk ox, monkey, nutria, raccoon, wombat and wallaby, even hamsters and domesticated cats. But throughout history, the mink, beaver and seal reigned supreme among the most fashionable of furs.

By the beginning of the 19th century, animal rights movements were making headway in Europe, coinciding with humanitarian movements such as anti-slavery and women’s suffrage. In 1884, the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) was established in Europe, and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) in the United States followed in 1986. With the decline of agriculture as a way of life – coupled with suburban affluence and pet ownership – animal rights movements flourished among a new base of animal lovers: the pet owner. The focus originated with domestic animals but increased to include the protection of wild animals, as well. Since then, many organizations and protections have been created in the name of animal safety: the Humane Slaughter Act (1958), the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act (1966), the Endangered Species Act (1969), the Horse Protection Act (1970), the Marine Mammal Protection Act (1972), International Society for Animal Rights, the Animal Protection Institute, the Primate Protection League (1973),  the Society for Animal Protective Legislation, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)(1980), and many more. By the late 20th century, the popularity of fur dwindled as animal rights groups began to expose many brutal practices and sway public opinion. However, fur farming still exists and fur is still a wanted commodity in many parts of the world.

Cry of the Innocent asserts that there is an extreme disconnect between human awareness and animal cruelty, evidenced by the fact that fur is viewed as a commodity, rather than as the skin of a once living, breathing, and sentient being. Even domestic cats and dogs are at risk of becoming clothing: the film explores the use of domestic animals in faux and synthetic furs to make them more “realistic.” According to The Cry of the Innocent, to address the issues of the fur industry is to address the issues of our own collective consciousness. Why do we farm or mistreat animals only to slaughter them for fashion? Why do fashion and vanity trump the lives of animals? In a modern world where warmth and style can be achieved without the desultory slaughter of millions of animals, why is fur still glamorized? These are the questions this film asks in an attempt to change the way we view skins and furs. As Lowson has stated: “The power of respect will change our world” – respect for ourselves and respect for life.

The trailer for Cry of the Innocent, as well as links to two articles and information about the film and about the fur industry itself, can be found here.

The film attempts to educate the public about these issues without overwhelming viewers with gory or violent images. “It will be evocative,” said Lowson, “interpreting from the ‘soul perspective’ rather than sheer reporting, revealing the psychological and emotional truth. This is a unique, precedent-setting approach that explores the underlying source of harm in our society and awakens consciousness on our planet by unearthing a more expansive nemesis permeating our world.”

The issue doesn’t stop with merely speaking out against animal cruelty; it stops when we take a good look at our lifestyles and realize the detrimental effects our continuous need for more can have on animals, natural landscapes and ourselves.

– by Jessica Schmonsky


 If you too are interested in becoming a citizen eco-reporter, contact Izilwane at: ExecDirector@izilwane.org.


  1. Kathleen Lowson
    August 23, 2014, 11:11 pm

    Reply to Victoria: Thank you for your insightful comment and your compassion for the animals. Just so you are aware, the film is not funded by PETA nor is PETA connected or involved in the making of the film in any way. This film is independently produced and funded by donations, and is currently fundraising via the film’s website: http://www.cryoftheinnocent.com – Kathleen Lowson, Director, Cry of the Innocent: The Voices That Can’t Speak

  2. Kathleen Lowson
    August 23, 2014, 11:02 pm

    Response to Gil Theriault: The term “innocent” in the title of the film is a reference to the animals’ pure, trusting nature, uncorrupted by evil and failure to recognize the motives of others. With regard to your comment that “National Geo sides up with radicals like PETA” is inaccurate. This article is an independent piece about the film and simply uses references to organizations that are involved in the animal welfare movement. – Kathleen Lowson, Director, Cry of the Innocent: The Voices That Can’t Speak http://www.cryoftheinnocent.com

  3. Victoria
    June 15, 2014, 1:51 am

    Gil…psychobabbel aside….They are skinning dogs and cats alive!!!! This is an abomination!!! If we are so damn superior, then we should always show mercy. I really don’t care if Bin Laden or Hitler is funding the movie, as long as we have a serious look at how we treat the other creatures who walk the Earth with us. You can worry about Peta’s ultimate goal after we stop the cruelty, OK?

  4. Shenita Etwaroo
    New York City
    April 27, 2014, 1:54 pm

    “The time to evolve our consciousness is now. Cry o the Innocent: The Voices that Can’t Speak is a monumental film and call to action that is a magnificent contribution to the animal rights movement.” – Dr. Shenita Etwaroo http://shenitaetwaroo.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-time-to-evolve-our-consciousness-is_31.html

    April 19, 2014, 4:36 am

    Stoppez ces Massacres D’Animaux pour leur Fourrures
    c’est Inhumain et de la Barbaries

  6. Izilwane | Food for Thought
    September 4, 2012, 10:55 pm

    […] Cry of the Innocent […]

  7. Gil Theriault
    July 3, 2012, 2:56 pm

    Interesting choice of word:”innocent”. Of course, every human wants to protect the innocent. Which, by the way, is not the case with other predator that will attack first the innocents (young, handicap, old) to feed.
    But can you be qualified as innocent if you can ever be found guilty of something? Other than human, do animals have responsabilities and guilt? If they have rights, that should go with it, no?
    Food for thoughts.
    Meanwhile, it’s very deceiving to see Nat Geo side up with radicals like PETA. They are unreasonable people who don’t want humans to better manage his resources, but to stop all use of animal. Is that Nat Geo’s mission too?
    The public should know that when they choose to consume their products.


  9. Cry of the Innocent | AN1MAL
    June 20, 2012, 11:30 am

    […] Read more at the source:  Jessica Schmonsky, National Geographic […]

  10. vegangsterARNP
    June 19, 2012, 8:31 pm

    Who are you wearing, but more importantly, do you EVEN care? WAKE UP!

  11. Lesley
    June 19, 2012, 7:25 pm

    I am thrilled to see films such as Cry of the Innocent that expose the horrors of the global fashion fur trade. People have no idea that even domestic dogs and cats are used in the fur trade. Furthermore, investigations have shown fur labelled as “fake” is actually real. It’s all confusing for the consumer. Films like Cry of the Innocent are essential for bringing a certain level of transparency to one of the cruelest and unnecessary industries on Earth. http://www.furbearerdefenders.com