VOICES Voices Icon Ideas and Insight From Explorers


1833 Meteor Storm Started Citizen Science


Woodcut depiction of 1833 meteor storm.
Woodcut depiction of 1833 meteor storm. Courtesy of Elsevier/M. Littmann

The science of shooting stars owes much to a storied episode of crowdsourcing, a new historical report shows, kicked off by a stunning 1833 meteor shower.

Astronomers have increasingly turned to “citizen science” in the Internet era, setting up everyday folks to look for everything from alien worlds to the Milky Way’s galactic gas bubbles. But in a new Endeavour journal report, Mark Littmann and Todd Suomela of the University of Tennessee in Knoxville show that there is nothing new about the practice, with one Yale astronomer pioneering crowdsourced astronomy well over a century ago.

The astronomer, Denison Olmsted, was awakened by neighbors on November 13, 1833, and walked into the cold November night to see a sky filled with shooting stars, 72,000 or more per hour. It was the November meteor shower we now call the Leonids, but at the time, no one knew what caused the display or where meteors came from. But because of the number of shooting stars filling the heavens—20 a second—Olmsted saw clearly a pattern that had escaped other astronomers.

“Olmsted realized for the first time that they came from one point, one he first called the radiant,” Littmann says. Astronomers today still use the radiant to name meteor showers: The Leonids take their name from their seeming origin in the constellation Leo, the Lion. And the Perseids seen in early August every summer take their name from their origin in the constellation Perseus.

Citizen Science Starts

But Olmsted didn’t stop with that discovery. “Just as dawn was brightening the sky, causing the meteors to disappear from view, Olmsted rushed inside and dashed off a brief report on the meteor storm for the New Haven Daily Herald newspaper,” says the study.

“As the cause of ‘Falling Stars’ is not understood by meteorologists, it is desirable to collect all the facts attending this phenomenon, stated with as much precision as possible,” Olmsted wrote to readers, in a report subsequently picked up and pooled to newspapers nationwide. Responses came pouring in from many states, along with scientists’ observations sent to the American Journal of Science and Arts.

“This was a seminal moment in American science journalism, really in science journalism worldwide,” says Littmann, author of The Heavens on Fire: The Great Leonid Meteor Storms. “Until then, the newspapers were mostly political rags, filled with opinion, but here they did a very good job of dispassionately reporting on the meteors, calming people down that it wasn’t ‘The End of Days.'”

Astronomer Denison Olmstead
Astronomer Denison Olmsted, citizen science pioneer. Courtesy of Elsevier/M. Littmann

The responses also let Olmsted make a series of scientific breakthroughs, ending the 2,200-year grip of Greek philosopher Aristotle on explanations for meteors, which he saw as bubbles of gas lofted high into the sky and ignited. Olmsted’s contemporaries suspected the bodies were electrified by lightning.

Aristotle’s Last Gasp

Instead, Olmsted’s crowdsourced observations showed that meteor showers were seen nationwide and fell from space under the influence of gravity. The crowd also noted that the showers had appeared before in yearly cycles, something that had eluded scientists, but not European farmers, for centuries.

Olmsted realized that the meteors must be smacking into Earth’s atmosphere from outer space. He estimated their speed at about 4 miles per second (6.4 kilometers per second), which he thought was fantastically fast. If he had been less conservative in the calculation, the observations from the crowd would have suggested their actual speed, about ten times faster. Because he didn’t realize that friction, instead of conventional burning, was firing up the shooting stars, Olmsted calculated their size as very large, up to a mile (1.6 kilometers) wide instead of the pinprick-size comet dust particles they actually are.

He did get their altitude nearly correct, triangulating the height of the fireballs with another scientific observer in New York at 30 to 50 miles (50 to 80 kilometers) high. He also surmised they originated from a body in a very elongated orbit around the sun, but it would not be until 1867 that astronomers made the connection between meteors and the dust left behind in comet tails, linking the trail of comet Tempel-Tuttle to the Perseids.

“He was ahead of his time, a remarkable guy, not least in using crowdsourcing for the first time, as far as we know, in mass media,” Littmann says. “Meteor astronomy really began with this shower.”

Every 30 years or so, particularly in 1966, the Leonids have produced remarkably strong showers as a reminder of the 1833 event, although they have declined overall as the comet-tail cloud spawning the meteors has thinned over time. The Leonids are expected to peak around November 16 and 17 this year.

Follow Dan Vergano on Twitter.


  1. German
    September 6, 8:09 pm

    I have a question, would this the the event that the bible talks about that one 3d of the stars will fall in the end times???

  2. Vanessa Marquez
    United States
    September 2, 2014, 11:25 pm

    I found this story/topic very interesting.i love to use this national geographic website for school homework.i have to choose a scientific topic and write about it.i chose this passage/topic for today.and p.s. I am an intelligent student with all A+’s.i go to an all girls academic school.yayyy.I LOVE TO BRAG;)

  3. john
    September 2, 2014, 7:34 pm

    The article confuses the anti-science of Dark Age Christianity with Aristotle, then gets basic facts on the Father of Science wrong. Why?

    Aristotle merely reported or tried to find evidence for the scientific theories of his day. He made no claim on meteors, and in fact created the scientific method.

    He also wasn’t alive in 633 AD., as the article suggests.

    • Dan Vergano
      September 3, 2014, 9:42 am

      Thanks for the questions. In fact, Aristotle published Meteorology in 340 BC with his influential but incorrect explanation for meteors in 340 BC (this also partly explains why weather analysis today is still called meteorology.) Part 4 of Book 1 contains his claim that that shooting stars are ignited exhalations from the Earth (see http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/meteorology.1.i.html). But thanks for noting the date typo, I’ve corrected the number.

      Aristotle was notable for relying on observations in an era of Platonism, but he didn’t create the scientific method. The experimental method which is the hallmark of science is usually attributed to Francis Bacon, Galileo, Descartes and others after the 15th Century.

  4. Alan Seeger
    United States
    September 2, 2014, 1:15 am

    Contact your local university’s Geology department.

  5. Martina B Rodriguez
    sylmar ca
    September 1, 2014, 9:36 pm

    I was in Yosemite in August 17 @ 22:00 the sky was full of stars so bright and beautiful out of ordinary night but it didn’t last to long; I went out few minutes afte, the sky had the normal and regular stars that we see every night. What is the name of thi fenomonu ?

  6. Phil Olson
    Fairbanks, Alaska
    September 1, 2014, 12:50 pm

    I have used a powerful magnet strip to go through gravel beds. Over the years I have collect over a cupful of magnetic rocks with arcs of shocked mineral. This collection is assumed to be meteor fragments consisting of nickel-iron meteorites since no iron deposits existed in the areas they were collected.
    Non metallic meteor fragments would be much harder to idenify by the naked eye.

  7. Dwayne LaGrou
    Lapeer, Michigan
    August 30, 2014, 8:59 pm

    It would be a reasonable assumption that the annual meteor showers would be declining in the number of shooting stars seen since the source is not adding to the amount of dust in space and the fact that as time goes on the dust trail will be thinning out as they spread themselves throughout space. Only when they are immediately following a recent comet passing or other space object would the sightings become more frequent. Now I’m not a trained scientist in this area but it only makes sense that as time goes on they will always be declining as they spread out. If there are any scientists that can elaborate on this I welcome their input.
    Also, Another Great article Nat Geo, Keep up the good work!!!

  8. Marius le Roux
    August 30, 2014, 2:21 pm

    I found a small piece of a stone with almost yellowish dots on it how/where can I found out ex what it is.Maybe a meteor.