In the wake of Cecil the lion’s killing in Zimbabwe we are seeing real conversations about hunting: its viability and its ethics.
It has opened some tough discussions, like if we should all boycott Zimbabwe, or whether lion hunting is in any shape or form a viable conservation tool.
I don’t think it’s a good idea to boycott Zimbabwe. Thousands of local Zimbabweans live off photographic tourism and a range of other jobs that are not involved in hunting. Many of these people have chosen non-hunting industries because they already don’t like the business or ethics of hunting.
Just today I was filming some lions hunting zebras and I reflected on the difference between a hunting lion and a man hunting a lion. Both are undeniably violent acts. But one is necessary, the other is not. One is for food, the other is not. One involves no great celebration of death, one ends in high fives and alcohol celebrations and often some blooding rituals.
In essence, a lion hunt may be vicious, but it is not cruel. The activity of Dr. Palmer’s (the hunter who paid for and killed this famous lion) is one of malicious intent and cruelty and there are almost no examples of that in nature.
Beverly and I started the National Geographic Big Cats Initiative specifically because of incidents exactly like this shooting by Dr. Palmer, which is not unique. (His excuse is incredibly weak, that he didn’t know he was on land where it is illegal to hunt and that also did not know that he was shooting a collared research lion baited out of the park!) Hunters come to at least seven countries in Africa to shoot over 500 lions a year. Eighty percent of those lopped-off heads and skins go back to the United States.
If we stopped killing for fun, we could stop the slide in the lion populations: Dereck Joubert
This is going on while we have seen 95 percent declines in lion populations over the past 60 years and continue to lose 5 lions a day. Loss of habitat is partly responsible, conflict with livestock and poaching also play a role — but so does hunting. If we stopped killing for fun, we could stop the slide in the lion populations.
Canned Lion Hunting
This desire to kill has fuelled an entire industry called “Canned Lion Hunting,” where lions are bred in cages and released for hunters to kill. For what? What is it that drives some of us to want to slaughter an animal that we have come to understand, from 32 years working with lions, are mostly passive and wanting to go about their business.
Hunting is Largely About Ego
Every time I have tested the desire to hunt and kill a lion with hunters I get a range of answers, from that it is for conservation, to it being about saving villagers from a marauding lion, to that it is cropping out the old, sick and surplus. (Mostly I just get death threats.) But in reality, it seems, it is all about showing off.
Hanging a head in the boardroom or the slaughterhouse-style trophy room, with its staring eyes and fangs at the ready, sends a signal to the impressionable visitor about the “brave” hunter. If it was all about the wonderful outdoors there are thousands of outlets for the sportsman that don’t end in the blood and lolling tongue of a dead lion.
It Is not Brave to Shoot a Lion
I state this again: It is not brave to shoot a lion. Wrestling a lion to death with your bare hands might be brave. But safely at the long end of a telescopic sight and a high-powered rifle, or even with a state-of-the-art compound bow and arrow, it isn’t brave. It’s target practice. Shooting elephants is even easier, a little like shooting at a barn door.
Arnold Schwarzenegger said it well recently [on Twitter, image alongside]: Bravery is joining the military, not killing big cats.
[Join Schwarzenegger’s support of big cats by donating $5 and uploading a photo of yourself giving a virtual high five to any social media platform, with the hashtag #5forBigCats. Learn more.]
They fact that Palmer had to drag a bait to get Cecil the lion out of a park, and out of protection, and that he shot him with an arrow and then later a bullet, is not only testament to poor ethics, but also to the damaging impact already created in designated hunting areas where lions are so depleted that they have to bait ‘Cecils’ from conservation areas.
The science is clear: Lions decline in number where they are hunted. The fact that anyone still debates this is astounding, but at least 55,000 members of a group called Safari Club International do. They feel that shooting lions protects them, despite study after study over decades that prove the contrary.
We worked in an area once that saw every single male lion killed by hunters. The male cubs that were left behind grew up, started mating with their sisters, and mothers, until these young males were also shot.
Soon we saw deformities developing and the collapse of the entire population.
No National Wealth in Hunting
There is no doubt in my mind that the hunting of lions is morally bankrupt. But let’s look at the economics.
Botswana stopped lion hunting over 10 years ago, and all hunting in 2014. The lion population is at least stable now.
One former hunting area called the Selinda Reserve was converted to only photographic tourism. The increase in wildlife has been spectacular; the increase in revenue to government and its people is something like 1,300 percent. Employed people have the benefit of real skills transfer and training. The old hunting companies hired minimally; now instead of 10 or 12 jobs in these areas there are 180 people employed full time just in this one reserve.
Hunting in the countries that still allow it contributes less than 0.27% to the national GDP. In Botswana ecotourism is the largest employer in the northern districts and hires 40 percent of the working population.
One Hunting License May Kill 23 Lions
Every time one hunting license is issued, a male lion is shot. However, males often work and live in groups of two like Cecil and his partner male. They need these partnerships to defend their territories and the females in the prides. When one is killed, the remaining male is left vulnerable to attack, and is most often ousted by marauding males.
Males coming in to a pride have one desire, to start their own families, not to raise the ousted male’s cubs. So they immediately kill all the cubs in the pride. On average a pride may have between 10 and 20 cubs (if the average pride is 8 females.) One license kills one male and his partner, as well as about 20 cubs, and often a mother who wants to defend her cubs. Total tally for one license: 23 lions! This is what we can expect for Cecil’s pride, a group of six females.
Hunting ‘Problem Lions’, a Myth
Hunters will say, ‘what about safari hunting of cattle raiders?’ This is totally impractical. Firstly, a safari is booked months if not years out. A cattle post, if raided by lions, is something that needs to be reacted to the next day. I have no idea how anyone could sell a safari for the first week in August 2016 and know that they could be called in to help solve a cattle-raiding problem during that week. These problem animal hunts are bogus and another falsehood set up by a corrupt industry.
Secondly, most livestock raiders are females (often old) or young nomadic males. Neither of those two demographics is a hunting trophy! Hunters want the largest and best male lions with large manes. It’s a trophy after all! Besides that, if a 13-year-old Kenyan boy can come up with the ideal anti-lion device for cattle at night (random flashing solar-powered LED lights) then we surely don’t need guns to solve this issue.
Hunting ‘Old Cast Out Males’, Another Myth
Another myth is that hunters only shoot old males past their prime that have been cast out from the pride. In 30 years studying lions, I have only come across 3 such males. All of them were so old and tired that you could have swatted them with a baseball bat. But more important is that when males are finally thrown out, they almost always lose their manes from stress, so as to not be carrying around a healthy mane that will attract aggressive attention from the resident males.
Some hunters of lions don’t bother too much about lion mane-deficiencies, of course. There are a few establishments in the U.S. that will provide trophies with hair extensions for undersized manes so that when displayed your lion will evoke gushing admiration rather than embarrassing “shames” as your friends look at a not quite fully grown male cub with its natural Mohican styled mane.
Only 3,000 Cecils Left in the Wild
If one unpacks the statistics, shocking figures emerge. We may have between 20,000-30,000 lions left in the world. Of those, there may be as few as 3,000 males like Cecil left.
People do not change under threat of retaliation or fines. They change by peer pressure. The stuffed toys and protests outside of the hapless dentist’s office are sending a signal that enough is enough. A petition is circulating, calling on the U.S. government to list lions as an Endangered Species and giving them full protection. Only one group is opposing this, the hunting fraternity.
I hope that Cecil the lion has died for at least some cause: to rally everyone to get this important legislation passed and to stop the killing of lions for fun.
Dereck and Beverly Joubert are award-winning filmmakers from Botswana who have been Explorers-in-Residence for over four years. Their mission is the conservation and understanding of the large predators and key African wildlife species that determine the course of all conservation in Africa.
They have been filming, researching, and exploring in Africa for over 25 years. Their coverage of unique predator behavior has resulted in 22 films, 10 books, six scientific papers, and many articles for National Geographic magazine. This body of work has resulted in five Emmys, a Peabody, the World Ecology Award, and the recent induction into the American Academy of Achievement.
Beverly Joubert also is an acclaimed photographer, and many of her photographs have appeared in National Geographic magazine. Filmmaking for them has always been a way to bring the message of conservation to audiences. Their recent expansion into conservation tourism via their new company, Great Plains, is a venture into community/conservation partnerships in Africa, and Great Plains has received awards for responsible tourism in London and South Africa.
Dereck and Beverly established the Big Cats Initiative with National Geographic as an emergency action fund to drive the world’s attention to big cats and to develop real solutions to stop the decline that has seen lion numbers drop from 450,000 to 20,000 in 50 years.